Author: Custom Essay

Due Week 6 and worth 300 points

Using the regression results and the other computations from Assignment 1, determine the market structure in which the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food company operates.

Use the Internet to research two (2) of the leading competitors in the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food industry, and take note of their pricing strategies, profitability, and their relationships within the industry (worldwide).

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

Outline a plan that will assess the effectiveness of the market structure for the company’s operations. Note: In Assignment 1, the assumption was that the market structure [or selling environment] was perfectly competitive and that the equilibrium price was to be determined by setting QD equal to QS. You are now aware of recent changes in the selling environment that suggest an imperfectly competitive market where your firm now has substantial market power in setting its own “optimal” price.
Given that business operations have changed from the market structure specified in the original scenario in Assignment 1, determine two (2) likely factors that might have caused the change. Predict the primary manner in which this change would likely impact business operations in the new market environment.
Analyze the major short run and long cost functions for the low-calorie, frozen microwaveable food company given the cost functions below. Suggest substantive ways in which the low-calorie food company may use this information in order to make decisions in both the short-run and the long-run.

TC = 160,000,000 + 100Q + 0.0063212Q2

VC = 100Q + 0.0063212Q2

MC= 100 + 0.0126424Q

Determine the possible circumstances under which the company should discontinue operations. Suggest key actions that management should take in order to confront these circumstances. Provide a rationale for your response. (Hint: Your firm’s price must cover average variable costs in the short run and average total costs in the long run to continue operations.)
Suggest one (1) pricing policy that will enable your low-calorie, frozen microwavable food company to maximize profits. Provide a rationale for your suggestion.

(Hints:

In Assignment 1, you determined your firm’s market demand equation. Now you need to find the inverse demand equation. Having found that, find the Total Revenue function for your firm (TR is P x Q). From your firm’s Total Revenue function, then find your Marginal Revenue (MR) function.
Use the profit maximization rule MR = MC to determine your optimal price and optimal output level now that you have market power. Compare these values with the values you generated in Assignment 1. Determine whether your price higher is or lower.)

Outline a plan, based on the information provided in the scenario, which the company could use in order to evaluate its financial performance. Consider all the key drivers of performance, such as company profit or loss for both the short term and long term, and the fundamental manner in which each factor influences managerial decisions.

(Hints:

Calculate profit in the short run by using the price and output levels you generated in part 5. Optional: You may want to compare this to what profit would have been in Assignment 1 using the cost function provided here.
Calculate profit in the long run by using the output level you generated in part 5 and cost data in part 3 and assuming that the selling environment will likely be very competitive. Determine why this would be a valid assumption.)

Recommend two (2) actions that the company could take in order to improve its profitability and deliver more value to its stakeholders. Outline, in brief, a plan to implement your recommendations.
Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia does not qualify as an academic resource.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Analyze short-run and long-run production and cost functions.
Apply macroeconomic concepts to changes in global and national economies and how they affect economic growth, inflation, interest rates, and wage rates.
Evaluate the profit-maximizing price and output level for given operating costs for monopolies and firms in competitive industries.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in managerial economics and globalization.
Write clearly and concisely about managerial economics and globalization using proper writing mechanics

Key points
Witnesses saw nothing but tiny pieces of debris at crash site
scene was unlike a plane crash
investigators found no jet fuel on the ground
witnesses saw no human remains
large amount of paper debris (which included belonging of alleged high jacker) survived the crash
Black boxes found at a different location than crash site
debris found miles away from crash
Why wasn’t the highjacked plane shot down as protocol dictates
high quantities of plane wreckage and human remains were later found
conflicting evidence
phone calls made from the plane. was this possible?
Three minute discrepancy in tapes recorded from cockpit
a privately owned cottage near crash site was turn into shambles

Recommended Source: 911 Scholars for Truth
The Cellphone and Air phone calls from flight UA93
9/11 Commission Report Chapter 1
The Legend of United Flight 93
What happen to flight 93? Richard Wallace

Anything else you find that questions the original reports of passengers bringing down the plane. Was this a cover up by US government. At least 2 references a book or article
Comments from Support Team: I have attached the guidelines worksheet to my research paper. Topic: Discrepancies found with United Flight 93. The instructions include some of the conflicting evidence found on the original reports of the crash. Its a research paper which will ultimately provide the reader with a conclusion about what truly happen with united 93. Please feel free to contact me should you have any

existence or creation of alternative governance structures

Please answer the 5 questions below according TO CASE 11 (Rana Plaza Collapse in Bangladesh) in this book (Corporate Social Irresponsibility by Paula Alexander). Please answer the 5 questions ONLY from this book and this case.
1- What action management actually took.
2-Cost/benefit analysis of management’s actual course of action, as to each stakeholder
3-Aftermath of incident
4-Lessons other corporations can learn from this case.
5-Recommend a specific course of action to CEO and justify your recommendations.

Write a 1,500 word reflective account on your role both as a student in higher education (HE), future healthcare practitioner. Basically – you need to pick a skill applicable to students in HE. Presentation skills, public speaking, academic writing, communication etc, and reflect on an experience. Use the Gibbs reflective cycle which has an action plan, and as an appendix attach a SMART action plan table.

Your writing must capture your initial reflections on your role as student in higher education;
Your role as a future healthcare practitioner
A SMART action plan to address an identified developmental need (weakness) / to be addressed over the first year of your programme.

The Gibbs reflective account allows you to provide evidence of your learning and your achievement of the learning outcomes. It also enables the assessment process to be a record of your learning journey and not just a final product.

Referencing – You are expected to support your work with relevant literature using the Harvard system of referencing.
These are the outcomes that you must demonstrate clearly in your writing. Remember that all modules have the learning outcomes in the module study guides. Your work is always judged upon the outcomes so these are the most important considerations when writing your essays

1. Be able to describe and evaluate their role as a student in higher education and a future healthcare practitioner.

2. Reflect on, and evaluate, own learning strengths, styles and needs as an adult learner in higher education.

3. Develop action plans to address a developmental need to be undertaken over the first year of their programme and in year two.

Essay Guide

This layout is only a suggestion. You can meet the learning outcomes however you wish. As long as they are evident to the reader. You must apply best academic style and tone, with a logical flow, supported by references.

Double line spaced, justified at the margins, size 12 Ariel font, page numbers, and your student ID must be in the Header of each page.

Introduction (No references in introduction)
Introduce this essay and what you aim to write about.

Main Body
Reflection
Use a reflective cycle to guide this section. Gibbs or Driscoll. Gibbs is ideal as it requests an action plan, and you need one as part of the learning outcomes.

You must include all of the following to meet the learning outcomes: remember to incorporate your Strengths weaknesses learning style as an adult learner. These must be included as they are part of the learning outcomes. I.e. Reflective learner – practical learner – read about learning styles as this is a compulsory learning outcome.

Describe your role as a student nurse.
Evaluate this role – who, what, why, when, and where?
How will this support you as a nurse in the future?
What actions can be taken to support your development into year 2?
Action plan can be made and added as an appendix (this doesn’t go into the word count).

Conclusion (No references in conclusion)
Alphabetical Order NOT numerical.
No bullet points.
No numbers.

What is your summary, what have you learnt, are there any recommendations?

Reference List (Strictly in Harvard Style)

GENERIC MARKING SCHEME

The standard achieved is exceptional and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a level appropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at an exceptional standard.
The standard achieved is outstanding and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a level appropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at an outstanding standard.
The standard achieved is excellent and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a level appropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at an excellent standard.
The standard achieved is very good and the work provides clear evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a level appropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at a very good standard
The standard achieved is good and the work provides evidence that the knowledge, understanding and skills are at a level appropriate to the level of study. There is evidence showing that all the learning outcomes appropriate to that level are achieved with many at a good standar

Medieval literature in Arab culture (fiction, frame story). Reading: The Thousand and One Nights; (Norton, Vol. 1, pages 1173-1197 (excerpts from the work)Discuss how the frame story and the “enframed” stories work in The Thousand and One Nights. How does the text draw upon fables for didactic (educational) purposes? Discuss relations between men and women in the work. Do you agree with the “lessons” in the text

Questions: 1/2 page single spaced
1). What evidence does Goldwater give of a decline of “morality” in American life?
2). Why does Goldwater stress the interconnection between “order” and “liberty”?

In order to complete this Assignment, you will need to obtain a copy of the movie Erin Brockovich (2000) or Silkwood (1983) at your local video rental store or download/stream a digital copy online via iTunes™, Amazon.com™, Netflix™, etc. In a 2-page paper, discuss the movie in terms of waste management and its association with the environment. Describe how waste management was mismanaged and the potential effects on human health. Conclude your paper with a discussion on the environmental policy which addresses the situation in the movie. PLEASE MAKE SURE TO CITE THE MOVI

Effects of littering and why hasn’t it been taken serious enough to stop it completely.

In general your proposal should include the following sections: I. Introduction In the real world of higher education, a research proposal is most often written by scholars seeking grant funding for a research project or it’s the first step in getting approval to write a doctoral dissertation. Even if this is just a course assignment, treat your introduction as the initial pitch of an idea. After reading the introduction, your readers should not only have an understanding of what you want to do, but they should also be able to sense your passion for the topic and be excited about the study’s possible outcomes. Think about your introduction as a narrative written in one to three paragraphs that succinctly answers the following four questions: What is the central research problem? What is the topic of study related to that problem? What methods should be used to analyze the research problem? Why is this important research, and why should someone reading the proposal care about the outcomes from the study? II. Background and Significance This section can be melded into your introduction or you can create a separate section to help with the organization and flow of your proposal. This is where you explain the context of your study proposal and outline why it’s important. Approach writing this section with the thought that you can’t assume your readers will know as much about the research problem as you do. Note that this section is not an essay going over everything you have learned about the research problem; instead, you must choose what is relevant to help explain the goals for your study. To that end, while there are no hard and fast rules, you should attempt to deal with some or all of the following: State the research problem and give a more detailed explaination about the purpose of the study than what you stated in the introduction. This is particularly important if the problem is complex or multifaceted. Present the rationale of your proposed study and clearly indicate why it is worth doing. Answer the “So What? question [i.e., why should anyone care]. Describe the major issues or problems to be addressed by your research. Explain how you plan to go about conducting your research. Clearly identify the key sources you intend to use and explain how they will contribute to your analysis of the topic. Set the boundaries of your proposed research in order to provide a clear focus. If necessary, provide definitions of key concepts or terms. III. Literature Review Connected to the background and significance of your study is a more deliberate review and synthesis of prior studies related to the research problem under investigation. The purpose here is to place your project within the larger whole of what is currently being explored, while demonstrating to your readers that your work is original and innovative. Think about what questions other researchers have asked, what methods they have used, and what is your understanding of their findings. Assess what you believe is still missing, and state how previous research has failed to examine the issue that your study addresses. Since a literature review is information dense, it is crucial that this section is intelligently structured to enable a reader to grasp the key arguments underpinning your study in relation to that of other researchers. A good strategy is to break the literature into “conceptual categories” [themes] rather than systematically describing groups of materials one at a time. To help frame your proposal’s literature review, here are the “five C’s” of writing a literature review: Cite: keep the primary focus on the literature pertinent to your research problem. Compare the various arguments, theories, methodologies, and findings expressed in the literature: what do the authors agree on? Who applies similar approaches to analyzing the research problem? Contrast the various arguments, themes, methodologies, approaches and controversies expressed in the literature: what are the major areas of disagreement, controversy, or debate? Critique the literature: Which arguments are more persuasive, and why? Which approaches, findings, methodologies seem most reliable, valid, or appropriate, and why? Pay attention to the verbs you use to describe what an author says/does [e.g., asserts, demonstrates, etc.]. Connect the literature to your own area of research and investigation: how does your own work draw upon, depart from, or synthesize what has been said in the literature? IV. Research Design and Methods This section must be well-written and logically organized because you are not actually doing the research. As a consequence, the reader will never have a study outcome from which to evaluate whether your methodological choices were the correct ones. The objective here is to convince the reader that your overall research design and methods of analysis will correctly address the research problem. Your design and methods should be unmistakably tied to the specific aims of your study. Describe the overall research design by building upon and drawing examples from your review of the literature. Be specific about the methodological approaches you plan to undertake to gather information, about the techniques you would use to analyze it, and about the tests of external validity to which you commit yourself [i.e., the trustworthiness by which you can generalize from your study to other people, places, or times]. When describing the methods you will use, be sure to cover these issues: Specify the research operations you will undertake and the way you will interpret the results of these operations in relation to your research problem. Don’t just describe what you intend to achieve from applying the methods you choose, but state how you will spend your time while applying these methods [e.g., coding text from interviews to find statements about changes to school curriculum]. Keep in mind that a methodology is not just a list of tasks; it is an argument as to why these tasks add up to the best way to investigate the research problem. This is an important point because the mere listing of tasks to be performed does not demonstrate that they add up to the best feasible approach. Be sure to anticipate and acknowledge any potential barriers and pitfalls in carrying out your research design and explain how you plan to address them. V. Preliminary Suppositions and Implications Just because you don’t have to actually conduct the study and analyze the results, this doesn’t mean that you can skip talking about the analytical process and potential implications. The purpose of this section is to argue how and in what ways you believe your research will refine, revise, or extend existing knowledge in the subject area under investigation. Depending on the aims and objectives of your study, describe how the anticipated results of your study will impact future scholarly research, theory, practice, forms of interventions, or policy. Note that such discussions may have either substantive [a potential new policy], theoretical [a potential new understanding], or methodological [a potential new way of analyzing] significance. When thinking about the potential implications of your study, ask the following questions: What might the results mean in regards to the theoretical framework that underpins the study? What suggestions for subsequent research could arise from the potential outcomes of the study? What will the results mean to practitioners in the natural settings of their workplace? Will the results influence programs, methods, and/or forms of intervention? How might the results contribute to the solution of social, economic, or other types of problems? Will the results influence policy decisions? In what way do individuals or groups benefit should your study be pursued? What will be improved or changed as a result of the proposed research? How will the results of the study be implemented, and what innovations will come about? VI. Conclusion The conclusion reiterates the importance or significance of your proposal and provides a brief summary of the entire study. This section should be only one or two paragraphs long, emphasizing why the research problem is worth investigating, why your research study is unique, and how it advances knowledge. Someone reading this section should come away with an understanding of: Why the study was done, The specific purpose of the study and the research questions it attempted to answer, The research design and methods used, The potential implications emerging from your proposed study of the research problem, and A sense of how your study fits within the broader scholarship about the research problem. VII. Citations As with any scholarly research paper, you must cite the sources you used in composing your proposal. In a standard research proposal, this section can take two forms, so consult with your professor about which one is preferred. References — lists only the literature that you actually used or cited in your proposal. Bibliography — lists everything you used or cited in your proposal with additional citations to any key sources relevant to understanding the research problem.