Author: Custom Essay

Conduct a Market Research: Multi Brand Comestic/Perfume Store
Requirements:
– The Store has to be located in Miami, Florida.
– The Store has to sell different cosmetic brands: REVLON, COVERGIRL, LOREAL, MAYBELLINE, NEUTROGENA, STEE LAUDER, CLINIQUE, MAX FACTOR, CHANNEL ETC.
– The Store must sell all major perfume brands: Gucci, Carolina Herrera, Channel, Hugo Boss, Calvin Klein, Oscar de La Renta, Dior, Versace, Ralph Lauren, Tommy, Lancome, Yves Saint Laurent, Givenchy, etc.

– The target market must be latin women
– Even though tourists are a good target market in Miami, the store should focus more in local women.
– The Store must have a service space where the company will offer make up, brows services and skin care services
– The store must have online presence and sell via internet
The store should sell also by catalogues.

The study should include and be designed to address several questions:
– Industry Analysis
– Who is the Target Market?
– What are the market needs?
– What are the major distribution channels?
– Which beauty products and beauty services potential clients want?
– Who are the major competitors?
– What should be the company’s competitive advantage?
– What should be the marketing strategy and price strategy?
– What are the General External Environment, opportunities and threats in the following environments • Economic • Demographic • Sociocultural • Political–Lega

As the newly appointed safety manager at a large plastics manufacturing company, you are called to the loading dock to find that a large truck, full of cartons of pellets used in the manufacturing process, is engulfed in flames. The truck slid on ice in the parking area and crashed into empty trailers. A call to the city emergency services indicated that they will be delayed indefinitely due to roads made impassible by the ice storm. The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for the pellets indicates that burning releases toxic smoke. Note that larger companies are likely to have their own emergency response teams equipped and trained to handle the most likely hazards found at the site.

Assignment:
Prepare an Incident Action Plan that includes all of the requirements shown below. Respond to each bullet point based on what you know of the situation. Clearly state any assumptions you make in your plan. The list is a subset of the United States Department of Health & Human Services’ suggested comprehensive Incident Action Plan available at www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/.

Identify at least two incident goals (i.e., where the response system should be at the end of response) and at least two operational objectives (i.e., major areas that must be addressed in the specified operational period to achieve the goals or control objectives).
Describe at least two response strategies (i.e., priorities and the general approach to accomplish the operational objectives) and at least two response tactics (i.e., specific methods developed to achieve the response strategies).
Prepare an organization list showing at least three primary roles and an assignment list with at least three specific tasks and their owners.
Explain a health and safety plan (to prevent responder injury or illness) that includes at least three provisions to ensure personnel safety.
Summarize a communications plan (how functional areas can exchange information) with at least a primary and secondary method of communication.
Locate the incident using a map or precise verbal description that allows responders to find the area and indicate an area that non-responders should avoid.
Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:

Must be seven to eight double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
Must use at least six scholarly sources, including a minimum of three from the Ashford Online Library, in addition to the textbook.
Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center

Adolescence to Early Adulthood – ASSIGNMENTS

Your Unit 3 assignment.

There is only one assignment due for Unit 3.

This is a 10 point assignment, due no later than midnight,November 30th.

I am happy to add a major twist to this assignment. First, you MUST select to read and discuss one of the articles I initially placed on the MUST READ list. Those articles included Social Psychology of Identities OR Adolescent Self-Efficacy OR Cognitive Development in Adolescence OR Adolescent Egocentrism.

Next, you were asked to compare and contrast one of those articles with one from a secondary list. Here is the twist: If you don’t like any of those secondary readings, you can select and review one that you find more interesting or appropriate.

This means that you can find a reading that is more valuable to you to read and compare with one of the articles from my original source bank. You must select a source that would be classified as a study. If you are unsure about what this means, please be sure to ask me.

Select something that is different from your own experiences because the idea is to take a sneak peek into how identity is formed by sets of people representing different groups. Please write a synopsis of what you learned in both articles, including where you see similarities and/or differences.

Maximum length: 4 double-spaced pages.

Article 35. Social Psychology of Identities has to be compared to Article 58. Dev. of homosexual youth

For this section of your paper (approximately 3–4 pages in length) address the following: •Describe your selected population health issue and the population affected by this issue. •Summarize the advocacy programs you researched in this area. •Explain the attributes that made those programs effective. •Develop a plan for a health advocacy campaign that seeks to create a new policy or change an existing policy with regard to the issue and population you selected. Be sure to include in your plan: ◦A description of the public health issue and proposed policy solution ◦Specific objectives for the policy you want to be implemented ◦The means by which you will convey information to various stakeholders on the need for this policy change ◦Be sure your proposed need is substantiated by data and evidence. ◦Methods of establishing support for the policy, including how to influence policymakers •Explain how the attributes of the effective advocacy programs you researched could be applied to your proposed advocacy campaign For this section of your paper (approximately 3–4 pages in length) address the following: •Explain whether your proposed policy could be enacted through a modification of existing law or regulation or the creation of new legislation/regulation. •Explain how existing laws or regulations could impact your advocacy efforts. •Provide an analysis of the methods you could use to influence legislators or other policymakers to support your policy. In particular, explain how you would use the “three legs” of lobbying in your advocacy efforts. •Summarize the obstacles you anticipate arising in the legislative process and how you could overcome these hurdles.

Considering the article, write an APA-formatted paper of 4–5 pages that addresses the following:

Part 1: Developing the Philosophical Thesis Statement

Alfred North Whitehead’s statement: “What is morality in any given time and place? It is what the majority then and there happen to like and immorality is what they dislike” is a very controversial statement. Think about this statement as you consider the following questions as a guide to help your formulate a thesis statement.

Select 1 of the following questions to answer and develop your thesis statement:

Businesses can have ethical standards, but businesses are not moral agents. Do you agree or disagree?
Is it true that the “bottom line” of business is profit and profit alone?
In business, are there other less tangible goals that are intrinsic to and just as important as making money?
In a business environment, why should people be moral as individuals?
Why should a corporation or organization be moral?
Could you apply the first formulation of Kant’s categorical imperative to a business environment?

Part 2: Developing the Essay

Identify your thesis statement (argument claim) within the introduction of your paper.
Conduct research using library resources.
Outline your essay, considering deontological ethics, teleological ethics, moral objectivism, and ethical relativism in your argument.
Provide at least 3 valid reasons to support your argument.
Also, be sure to include the following in your APA formatted essay:
Use of explanations of philosophical concepts such as utilitarianism, categorical imperatives, process philosophy, moral relativism, moral absolutism, ethical relativism, moral objectivism, deontological ethics, or teleological ethics to structure your essay and provide evidence to support your claims.

Your argument and reasons (claims) should be defended by philosophical concepts supported by evidence, which is based on your research. Please use the APA library to begin your research.

Part 3: Conclusion

Consider morality and ethics from the perspective of Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy and Immanuel Kant’s universal categorical imperative. After conducting your research and writing your essay, could you conclude that businesses can have ethical standards, despite the fact that businesses are not moral agents? Why or why not? Please explain summing up your argument.

Part 4: Review Checklist before submitting essay

Your essay should be checked for proper use of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
You may find that you change your mind on the issue as you are writing your paper. That is fine, but be sure to present your ultimate decision at the beginning of the paper, and stick to it consistently throughout. This may require that you go back and change paragraphs to support your changed thesis statement.
Your argument should be clear, concise, and supported with logically valid claims and evidence followed by APA in-text citations.
A reference page documenting your sources should be included

Writing Assignment #2: 12 Hours Without Technology In this course, you have read about interpersonal communication issues mainly in online communities. You have also read some commentary regarding the impact of technology on our relationships and communities; how reliant we are on various technologies and what this means for progress. The learning intentions of this writing assignment are twofold 1) You will find two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles on some aspect of online communication and use one course reading, in order to 2) analyze your experience going 12 hours without a chosen technology used primarily for communication, i.e. cell phone, computer (Internet, Facebook, Twitter). This writing assignment is designed to give you an opportunity to apply the concepts you have read about to this real life experiment. In a .doc (Word) document of about 800-1200 words (3-5 pages), using APA format and citations (hint: any references cited throughout the course are in APA format!), write a report covering the following: • Introduce and summarize briefly the scholarly, peer reviewed articles you found (i.e. what are the essential concepts, ideas, and/or insights presented by the author of the article? (NO quotations! If you want to use specific information, paraphrase and cite your source.) • Were you able to go 12 hours without your chosen technology? Why or why not? • Did you find this experiment difficult or easy? What did you choose to do instead of using your chosen technology? (For example, if you chose a cell phone, how did you contact people?) • What conclusions can you make based upon your experience with this experiment? (For example, overall, were you inconvenienced? Were your interpersonal relationships disrupted or questioned? Did you appreciate your chosen technology more or did you feel a certain feeling of freedom without it?) • In explaining your conclusions, what connections can you make to the research or information presented in the three readings you are using for this assignment? (Again, NO quotations! If you want to use specific information, paraphrase and cite your source.) Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources generally do not include websites, magazines or newspapers. Sometimes, these articles will reference or cite research that is in a scholarly journal, and so you should always try to find the direct source. Please see the helpful tips on how to search for academic journal articles and how to write your paper in APA format located in the course site for assistance. Please take your time to write a thoughtful assignment. I expect your writing to be at a college level – this means proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation (no “texting”!). See the grading rubric on the next page for specific grading information. Submit your paper in the Dropbox in the course site. Make sure to take a screenshot indicating the date and time of your submission. So, in case there is an issue with a missing assignment, you have proof that it was submitted. See specific instructions under the Writing Assignment tab in the course sit

Select a controversial issue in the field of consumer health (suggestions are in the uploaded file and please do select one of those topics) and conduct a search of relevant and reliable sources with regard to a chosen consumer health issue. Critically evaluate and report on the issue. Make sure that among your sources, four are scholarly review sources.

Class Paper A paper of 1500-2000 words (about 5 pages, double-spaced) is due on November 18. Value: 20 points Rubric – 4 points for grammar, 4 points for research, 4 points for organization, 4 points for reflections, and 4 points for overall style. For the paper, please choose a philosophical work by a philosopher. Any of the philosophers mentioned in our book or any person listed primarily as a philosopher in Wikipedia will qualify. Read at least 10 pages from a philosophical work. Do not just read about a philosopher, but read the philosopher’s own writing. Write a review of what you read. Describe what the work is about and give your true personal reflections on it. Here are some questions you might consider answering in your reflection on the work: Did you understand the work? Was it easy to read or completely baffling? Where do you agree and where do you disagree? Did you like the work? Hate it? Love it? Why? How does it reflect the Philosopher’s world and how does it reflect our world today? What have other people and philosophers said about the work? How does it relate to others stuff we learned in class? Do you recommend it? Why or why not? These questions are just suggestions; you don’t have to use them. You can write whatever you wish about the work. All papers should be submitted to Blackboard under the appropriate assignment. If you cannot access Blackboard, please submit it to my email address. Late papers are accepted until December 7. Late papers lose l0 points, so you will only receive a maximum of 10 points for your late paper.

Details: Visit the Social Psychology Network website. The website provides a number of links regarding conflict and antisocial behavior. Write a paper of 250-500 words in which you summarize what you learned. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required

In this unit, you will select a case law pertaining to the topic of intellectual property. Each case law analysis allows you to express yourself as clearly and fully as possible in dissecting a court decision. The purpose of the assignment is two-fold: To give you the opportunity to read a real court decision. To challenge you to think about how you would have decided the case. In your case law analyses, you must be able to navigate the court’s decision and summarize it; you are not expected to act as a judge or an advocate. Using your selected court decision, prepare an analysis that responds to the following: Articulates the importance, context, purpose, and relevance of law in a business environment: Identify the parties who are before the court. Provide a brief background to the problem. Summarize the facts in no more than 2–3 paragraphs. Identify what is the specific disagreement between the parties. Explain the ruling of the court in no more than 1–2 paragraphs. Evaluates key judicial concepts that influence the decisions related to business: Was there a dissenting opinion? If so, explain why some of the judges or justices disagreed with the majority in the decision. Do you agree with the court’s decision? Why or why not? You may choose any court case, either state or federal, as the basis for your case law analysis; however, the case should be applicable to the assignment topic. The recommended Web sites for researching and locating a case are listed in the Resources area. Your analysis should be no more than two pages, double-spaced. References and citations are to adhere to APA formatting and style guidelines. Prior to submitting your assignment, be sure to review the scoring guide to ensure you have met all of the grading criteria