Category: Essays

The aging adult with co-morbities.

Analyze the social construction of racial and ethnic identities in the South African case.

Research Question:Does cochlear implantation before the age of 5 improve vocabulary development in children with profound hearing loss? You are required to write a journal article for your selected .You need to conduct a systematic review based on the research question I have provided. There is a minimum of 5 and maximum of 10 articles to be reviewed. Evidence that you have reflected on the peer feedback you received from your Assessment 2 is required (I will provide this). To complete this task you will need to do all parts of the assignment as outlined below: (i) Reflect on the feedback you were given by your peer and in the beginning of your assignment indicate any changes you made to your research question, search strategy and/or the journal in response to this feedback. (maximum 200 words). (I will provide you the feedback I previously recieved) (ii) Within the assignment you will have a summary of your final search strategy to elicit the highest quality articles to inform your review. You will need to report the data bases, MESH terms and text words and limiters you used to achieve the 5-10 selected key articles for review. You will already have completed this aspect of the task in Assignment 1 with potentially some modification in response to your peer review. ( I will attach my assignment 1 where you can use the same search terms). (iii) Assess and critique each article using an appropriate tool. (iv) Report results of the assessment highlighting commonalities and divergent results. (v) Summarise the results and if able, make recommendations for practice, education or recommendations for future research. (vi) Comply with selected journal’s guidelines including headings, with the possible exception of their word limit. I will provide you with the journal I selected. (vii) Cut and paste the 5-10 articles’ bibliographic details and abstracts at the end of your assignment together with the author guidelines for marking purposes. Marking criteria: 1. Reflection on peer feedback is provided. (10 marks) Criteria 2 to 7(inclusive) form your journal article (systematic review) and each section or its equivalent will be marked as follows: 2. Title of your review and abstract (5 marks) 3. Introduction/Background (including choice of topic) (10 marks) 4. Methods used for critical analysis (20 marks) 5. Results (20 marks) 6. Discussion (20 marks) 7. Conclusion and recommendations (10 marks) 8. Adherence to your journal’s ‘instruction to authors’ including referencing style and reference list (5 marks) I will include 2 examplers of the assingment to make it easier to understand the expectations.

Evaluation

Evaluate the work by answering the following question:

· Is the research problem significant?

· Are the contributions significant?

· Are the claims valid?

Learn to be fair: point out the strengths and weaknesses of the work. if you are reading that has been published for a while , make sure you are reading the paper in the right historical context : what seems to be obvious now might have been ground- breaking the

paper review

A paper review is a short essay (3-4) pages single space reporting what you have learned from reading a research paper. Writing reviews for the papers you have read is a great way to sharpen your paper reading skills such a review is typically structured in three sections:

1. Summary

Give a brief summary of the work in your own words. This section demonstrates your understanding of the paper, and as such it should answer the following question:

· What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?

· What are the claimed contributions of the paper?

· How do the authors substantiate their claims?

· What are the conclusions?

· It is imperative that you use your own word to summarize the paper .another way to think of it is that you are writing an alternative, elaborate abstract for the paper.

Paper review

A paper review is a short essay (3-4) single space from attchment file pages reporting what you have learned from reading a research paper. Writing reviews for the papers you have read is a great way to sharpen your paper reading skills such a review is typically structured in three sections:

1. Summary

Give a brief summary of the work in your own words. This section demonstrates your understanding of the paper, and as such it should answer the following question:

· What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?

· What are the claimed contributions of the paper?

· How do the authors substantiate their claims?

· What are the conclusions?

· It is imperative that you use your own word to summarize the paper .another way to think of it is that you are writing an alternative, elaborate abstract for the paper.

2. Evaluation

Evaluate the work by answering the following question:

· Is the research problem significant?

· Are the contributions significant?

· Are the claims valid?

Learn to be fair: point out the strengths and weaknesses of the work. if you are reading that has been published for a while , make sure you are reading the paper in the right historical context : what seems to be obvious now might have been ground- breaking then.

3. Synthesis:

Generate any interesting thoughts you have on the work by consulting the following questions:

· What is the crux of the research problem?

· What are some alternative approaches to address the research problem?

· What is a better way to substantiate the claim of the authors?

· What is a good argument against the case made by the authors?

· How can the research results be improved?

· Can the research results be applied to another context?

· What are the open problems raised by this work?

Bottom-line can we do better than the authors

Use the Ashford Library to research a prominent leader, living or deceased, who you admire. Explain whether the leader’s style is transactional or transformational. What type of leadership characteristics does the leader demonstrate? What aspects of servant leadership does the leader exhibit? Provide relevant examples to support your claims.

The paper should be three pages in length (excluding title and reference pages). At least two scholarly references (a minimum of one being from the Ashford Library) plus the course textbook must be utilized in the research. The paper should also reflect proper APA format and style and integrate resources with in-text citations to support the writing. Vocabulary and course content should be integrated throughout the pape

our assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Compare and contrast the various types of computer crime.
Describe the different types of computer attacks.
Evaluate the ethical concerns that computer crimes raise in society and the impact of information technologies on crime, terrorism, or war.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in the investigation of computer crime.
Write clearly and concisely about computer crime investigation topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

Write a 3-4 page paper in which you:

Give an example of the measures, you believe, the government or society can implement to deter these types of crimes.
Using the categories presented in chapter two (2) of the textbook, categorize the type of modern attack(s) or computer crime(s) that were committed in this case.
Identify the technologies that exist to deter or reduce the threat of these types of computer crimes, and determine the effectiveness of these technologies to deter this specific crime.
Summarize similar success stories by similar government agencies within the U.S. and include the criminals that were caught, the agencies (if any) that were involved, and the sanctions or charges the criminals faced.
Use at least four (4) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources

Go to Yahoo! Finance’s Website, located at http://finance.yahoo.com/. Select a publicly traded company in which you are interested, and figure out its symbol (e.g.: Apple-AAPL). Insert the company symbol into the search bar on the left-hand side where it reads “Quote Lookup” and click “Go”. Once on the stocks trading page, look for the vertical blue menu on the left of the page. Scroll down to “COMPANY,” click on the link titled “Key Statistics,” and review basic financial metrics for the chosen company. Discuss two (2) key financial metrics used by investors to evaluate the riskiness of a stock. Select the financial metric that you would be most likely to use and explain your reasoning. Support your selection with one (1) real-world example.
Examine the concept of risk and return as it applies to financial instruments. Determine the relationship between the two (2) and whether or not the relationship between risk and return always holds true. Provide a rationale for your response