Examine contemporary attitudes toward the three treatments you selected.

Write a 2,450- to 3,500-word paper comparing and contrasting three therapeutic interventions used to treat this disorder. Compare measures of effectiveness, such as validity, efficacy, symptom and behavior management, and recidivism. One therapy should be cognitive in nature, one should be pharmacological in nature, and the third should be an alternative therapeutic treatment. Identify common symptoms associated with your disorder and rates of symptom reduction or management as reported with the three treatments. Based on your research, what would be your approach to treating the condition? Identify which treatments you would use. Explain why. Analyze the neurophysiology’s underpinnings of diseases and disorders. Examine contemporary attitudes toward the three treatments you selected. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Include 7 to 10 peer-reviewed sources.

Compare measures of effectiveness, such as validity, efficacy, symptom and behavior management, and recidivism.

Write a 2,450- to 3,500-word paper comparing and contrasting three therapeutic interventions used to treat this disorder. Compare measures of effectiveness, such as validity, efficacy, symptom and behavior management, and recidivism. One therapy should be cognitive in nature, one should be pharmacological in nature, and the third should be an alternative therapeutic treatment. Identify common symptoms associated with your disorder and rates of symptom reduction or management as reported with the three treatments. Based on your research, what would be your approach to treating the condition? Identify which treatments you would use. Explain why. Analyze the neurophysiological underpinnings of diseases and disorders. Examine contemporary attitudes toward the three treatments you selected. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Include 7 to 10 peer-reviewed sources

Describe one strength and one weakness of the U.S. Constitution.

America’s Democracy: Your Report Card The primary goal of your last assignment is to critically analyze the primary features of the American national government. The results of your analysis will indicate what you have learned over the last five weeks. In order to accomplish this task, it is important to critically evaluate the key facets of our American democracy. You have been preparing for this final assignment each week by constructing a detailed outline of the Final Paper’s main points through the weekly Learning Activities. In addition, you have read the course text and course readings, reviewed videos, and researched additional material for each week’s assignments and for this paper. This week, you will put all of those outlines, readings, reviews, and research together into a one summative paper. As we wrap up our course, reflect back on what you have learned about the key structures, systems, roles, and processes that embody our national government. Focus on the strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, and positive and negative impacts of these aspects of our democracy. Use what you have learned so far to evaluate our national government and recommend ways to enhance what works and repair what is not working well. Construct a six-page paper based on the detailed outlines that you created over the last four weeks. Scaffold your paper around the following outline: Title page Introduction (half page): Describe the paper’s overall thesis. Provide an overview of main points. The Constitution (1-1.5 pages) (Week 1): Describe one strength and one weakness of the U.S. Constitution. Recommend one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness. Federalism (1-1.5 pages) (Week 2): Describe one advantage and one disadvantage of a national policy that must be implemented by one agency of the federal bureaucracy. Recommend one option to maintain the advantage and one to improve the disadvantage. Branches of Government (1-1.5 pages) (Week 3): Describe one strength and one weakness of one branch of our government: Executive, Legislative, or Judiciary. Recommend one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness. Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Elections (1-1.5 pages) (Week 4): Describe one positive impact and one negative impact of one of the following: political parties, interest groups, or federal elections. Recommend one option to accentuate the positive impact and one to lessen the negative impact. Conclusion: Review your main points. Review your overall thesis. References page Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be at least six double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least eight scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Use what you have learned so far to evaluate our national government and recommend ways to enhance what works and repair what is not working well.

America’s Democracy: Your Report Card The primary goal of your last assignment is to critically analyze the primary features of the American national government. The results of your analysis will indicate what you have learned over the last five weeks. In order to accomplish this task, it is important to critically evaluate the key facets of our American democracy. You have been preparing for this final assignment each week by constructing a detailed outline of the Final Paper’s main points through the weekly Learning Activities. In addition, you have read the course text and course readings, reviewed videos, and researched additional material for each week’s assignments and for this paper. This week, you will put all of those outlines, readings, reviews, and research together into a one summative paper. As we wrap up our course, reflect back on what you have learned about the key structures, systems, roles, and processes that embody our national government. Focus on the strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, and positive and negative impacts of these aspects of our democracy. Use what you have learned so far to evaluate our national government and recommend ways to enhance what works and repair what is not working well. Construct a six-page paper based on the detailed outlines that you created over the last four weeks. Scaffold your paper around the following outline: Title page Introduction (half page): Describe the paper’s overall thesis. Provide an overview of main points. The Constitution (1-1.5 pages) (Week 1): Describe one strength and one weakness of the U.S. Constitution. Recommend one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness. Federalism (1-1.5 pages) (Week 2): Describe one advantage and one disadvantage of a national policy that must be implemented by one agency of the federal bureaucracy. Recommend one option to maintain the advantage and one to improve the disadvantage. Branches of Government (1-1.5 pages) (Week 3): Describe one strength and one weakness of one branch of our government: Executive, Legislative, or Judiciary. Recommend one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness. Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Elections (1-1.5 pages) (Week 4): Describe one positive impact and one negative impact of one of the following: political parties, interest groups, or federal elections. Recommend one option to accentuate the positive impact and one to lessen the negative impact. Conclusion: Review your main points. Review your overall thesis. References page Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be at least six double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least eight scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center

Analyze opinion articles written by Roger Cohen, The New York Times, with the goal of understanding how this author markets a personal brand.

Students will analyze opinion articles written by Roger Cohen, The New York Times, with the goal of understanding how this author markets a personal brand. Personal branding involves writing about a certain range of topics, writing to a particular audience, adopting a certain voice/tone, and habitually using certain rhetorical devices or modes of persuasion. The only 3 sources that can be used in this paper are the articles from New York Times, including Little Syria in Lesbos, Europe’s Deepest Debt, and An Unreliable German and the Volkswagen Debacle. Incorporating quotes from three articles are needed to support the points that are making

What is the tone of the book?

Essay 2: Literary Analysis. ​ • ​ • Due: Tuesday, Oct. 6 • Times New Roman, 12 point font • 5-6 pages, Double spaced • 3 sources (including the novel) cited in MLA format. • 3rd person (do not use I). Overview: Many people are intimidated by writing about literature. They don’t trust their interpretations of the literature, don’t understand some of the more technical jargon that English instructors like to use, and don’t feel like they have anything original to say. Learning to write about literature is, in many ways, a process of learning to trust yourself. We are all readers (or at least will be for this next paper.) We all form opinions on what we have read. And we all have reasons for forming those opinions. Writing about literature is simply expressing our opinions and giving the reasons for our opinions (with evidence). The same concept will be used for other argumentative writing you will do in this and future classes. Assignment: Your assignment is to write a literary analysis of Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut. You will give an argument or interpretation of the book, and back that interpretation up with evidence from the book itself and from scholarly sources (such as books in the library or journal articles from NC Live or Pro-Quest). Your analysis can focus on any aspect of the novel you find interesting or feel you have a strong opinion about. Some options include: • A focus on theme. What is the novel trying to say about war? Family? American values? History and the way we write about it? Fate and free will? Suffering? Masculinity? Time? Morality? The way prisoners of war are treated? Pick any theme in the book and develop it. • A focus on characterization. In this novel, we have a narrator (who serves as a surrogate for the author, Vonnegut), a man (Billy Pilgrim) who travels through time and space, Aliens, soldiers, a porn star, and many others. Pick a character who you find intriguing, and form an argument about characterization. How is the character developed by the author? Why? What purpose does that character hold, and how do they fit into the overall plot or theme? • A focus on structure. As Billy Pilgrim comes “unstuck in time,” so do we. The novel travels back and forth in both time and location. What effect does that have on you as a reader? Why might Vonnegut have chosen to construct the novel in such an intentionally disorienting way? What do critics say about the book’s structure? • A focus on history. Research WW2, especially the firebombing of Dresden (at which Vonnegut was present as POW). How does Vonnegut’s novel describe the events, and how do his descriptions compare to the historical account? Was bombing the city warranted or justified? Why or why not? • A focus on the science fiction elements of the novel. Why are they there, in a novel purportedly about war here on Earth? What do they add to the story, and what do they reveal about Billy and his character? How are the aliens depicted, and why? • A focus on the stylistic elements of the book. The book has a unique style, especially in its use of repetition. What effect does the repetition of phrases like “so it goes” have on the readers? What does the style contribute to the theme? • A focus on tone. What is the tone of the book? How is it developed? Why? Literary terms, Defined: Theme—The central meaning or dominant idea of a literary work. All of the elements of the work (tone, characters, plot, setting, symbols, etc.) often work together to add to or form the theme. This is not the subject of the work—this is an abstract concept that is “made concrete through the images, characterization, and action of the text” (Meyer 2195). Tone—The author’s “implicit attitude” towards the characters or the reader of his works. The tone is revealed by the author’s style (the words he/she uses and the way in which those words are arranged). The tone can be ironic, sincere, happy, sad, bitter, angry, etc. Characterization—The process by which the characters are made to seem realistic and whole to the reader. Often includes a protagonist (a central character the readers sympathize with) and an antagonist pitted against the protagonist. Characterization is developed by showing the readers the actions of the characters and letting the readers infer their personalities and motivations, and by telling the readers about the characters through a first or third person narrator. Symbol—A “person, object, image, word, or event that evokes a range of additional meaning beyond and usually more abstract than its literal significance” (Meyer 2194). Some symbols are universally acknowledged (flags = patriotism, country; cross = faith) while others are developed by writers to strengthen the meanings or themes of a work. Irony—“A literary device that uses contradictory statements or situations to reveal a reality different from what appears to be true.” Contradictions can come in terms of words (verbal irony, sarcasm) or situations (situational irony). Dramatic irony occurs when the readers know something the characters do not. Flashback—A break in the narration that reveals something about the character’s past and then returns to the present day. Often used to fill in gaps in the narration or add additional character development. Image—A word, phrase, or figure of speech (such as a simile or metaphor) that “addresses the senses, suggesting mental pictures of sights, sounds, smells, tastes, feelings, or actions” (2183). Foreshadowing—The introduction of elements early in the work that gives hints of something to come later. First Person Point of View—told using words like “I” that reveals the narration comes from the character itself. Third Person Point of View—Uses “he,” “she,” “they,” and does not participate in the story itself. Can be omniscient (knowing the thoughts and feelings of every character) or limited, knowing the thoughts and feelings of only one character. Websites to avoid Using as Sources. Anything “Wiki” (Wiktionary, wiki-articles, wikihow, etc.) Anything “e” (e-articles, e-zines, e-pedia, etc.) Yahoo (yahoo articles) Yahoo Answers / Wiki Answers About.com Ask.com Squidoo Buzzle Shmoop Howstuffworks Hubpages Urban Dictionary Buzzfeed Sparknotes Pink Monkey Comment sections Reddit Brainyquotes.com or any similar “quotes” site Review