Describe why you would or would not do the research by focusing on your personal interests, today’s social and political climate, and the contribution you think the research would make to social science or society.

Get a copy of a local or regional newspaper

or go to a newspaper’s website. Find three

articles that deal with social behavior or

characteristics. List the name of the paper,

the date of publication, and the headline for

each of these articles.

2. Select one of the stories and make a copy to

turn in with this exercise.

3. Create one research question on the topic of

the article that could be answered by social

research and state it.

4. Assuming you could get enough funding and

had the time to do research to answer the

question you stated, would you do the

research? Describe why you would or would

not do the research by focusing on your

personal interests, today’s social and political

climate, and the contribution you think the

research would make to social science or

society

In the following examples, the researcher has

made or will need to make a choice about ethical

principles. For each situation, identify the ethical

principle(s), speculate about why the researchers

made the decisions they did, and then state

whether you agree with their decisions.

66 CHAPTER 3 • Ethics and Social Research

9781305548770, An Invitation to Social Research: How It’s Done, Fifth Edition, Adler/Clark – © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. No distribution allowed without express authorization. Distributed by Grand Canyon University.

A. Professor Ludwig’s research question is

whether there is a connection between

experiencing family violence and academic

achievement among students. He contacts

the principal of a local high school who

agrees to the school’s participation. At a

school assembly, the principal hands out

Professor Ludwig’s questionnaire, which includes

questions about family behavior including

violence between family members.

The principal requests that the students fill

out the survey and put their names on it. The

following day, Professor Ludwig uses school

records to obtain information about each

student’s level of academic achievement so

that he can answer his research question. He

keeps all information that he obtains confidential

and presents only a statistical analysis

of the data.

1. What ethical principle(s) do you think

was (were) violated in this research?

2. Describe the probable reason(s) Professor

Ludwig violated the principle(s) you

noted in your answer to Question 1.

3. Describe your reactions to the way this

study was done.

B. Professor Hawkins receives funding from

both a state agency and a national feminist

organization to study the connection among

marital power, spouses’ financial resources,

and marital violence. Deciding to interview

both spouses from at least 100 married couples,

she contacts potential participants by

mail. Because she is a university professor,

she writes to each couple on university letterhead

stationery and asks each couple to

participate in her study. She specifies that she

will be interviewing them about their marriage

but does not state the specific topics

that the interview will cover or the source of

her funding. She specifies that everything the

couple tells her will be kept confidential.

1. What ethical principle(s) do you think

was (were) violated in this research?

2. Describe the probable reason(s) Professor

Hawkins violated the principle(s) you

noted in your answer to Question 1.

3. Describe your reactions to the way this

study was done.

C. To study a radical “right-to-life” group,

Professor Jenkins decides to join the group

without telling the members that he is secretly

studying it. After each meeting, he returns

home and takes field notes about the

members and their discussion. After several

months of attending meetings, he is invited to

become a member of the group’s board of

directors and he accepts. One evening at the

group’s general membership meeting, one

member of the board becomes enraged during

the discussion about abortion information

and procedures available at a local

women’s health clinic. He shouts that the

clinic staff deserves to die. Later that week,

someone fires a gun through several windows

of the clinic. Although no one is killed,

several clinic staff and one patient are injured.

The police find out that Professor

Jenkins has been studying the local group

and subpoena his field notes. Professor

Jenkins complies with the subpoena, and the

board member is arrested.

1. What ethical principle(s) do you think

was (were) violated in this research?

2. Describe the probable reason(s) Professor

Jenkins violated the principles you noted

in your answer to Question 1.

3. Describe your reactions to the way this

study was done and the researcher’s

response to the subpoen

Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]