Demonstrate an appropriate reasoning in recommendations to minimize transition problems.

Mark Jones, a Production Manager, has been transferred from the manufacturing plant in his hometown of Chicago to his company’s overseas manufacturing plant in Osaka, Japan.

You are the company’s I-O psychologist. Using Hofstede’s Five Basic Elements of Culture Distinction, write an e-mail message to the Vice President (VP) of Production discussing at least three cultural differences that Mark will experience in managing front-line plant workers in Japan in contrast to in the United States. Also address how cultural differences may play a role in individual differences Mark will experience.

Your e-mail message should also include at least three recommendations on how managers can take up overseas tasks with minimum transition problems. State the rationale for your recommendations.

Because the VP of Production is a busy individual, restrict your e-mail message to one to two pages. Type the e-mail message in Microsoft Word.

Where appropriate use structured text—bold format, headings, bulleted lists, and graphics—to clarify your meaning and to make your document easier to read. Remember texting language will not be acceptable.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Demonstrated an understanding of Hofstede’s Five Basic Elements of Culture Distinction.
20
Logically identified and listed a minimum of three cultural differences between managing workers in Japan and in the United States.
20
Addressed what role cultural differences may play in individual differences.
10
Prepared an e-mail message containing a minimum of three recommendations to minimize transition problems.
20
Demonstrated appropriate reasoning in recommendations to minimize transition problems.
25
Used correct grammar, spelling, and word choice and cited all sources as per the APA style.

Find whether we should have a flexible workforce or equipment.

my part in this project is to talk about the alternative fuel in three points
1- finding the optimal degree of customer/ employee involvement in project
2- finding whether we should have a flexible workforce or equipment
to help with the first tow points you might need detail about MTO/MTS, layout of the process, and cost of the operation.
3- evaluating performance of the existing process
to help with the last point you might need detail about problem areas, number of failures, and frequencies for areas of intreats.
I’m going to attach some powerpoint slide to help you and Ill attach some information about the company

Illustrate a purpose statement, indicating the response from the audience you wish to achieve an introduction, a body, including supporting evidence transitions and a conclusion.

Using the template in lesson one, prepare an outline in complete sentence form for each speech. This does not mean writing your entire speech, only the topic sentence for the three to five supporting points that prove your thesis. Include a thesis statement that contains the claim or prediction you will prove or illustrate (which is usually spoken); a purpose statement, indicating the response from the audience you wish to achieve (which is not usually spoken); an introduction; a body, including supporting evidence; transitions; and a conclusion. When you use outside sources in creating your speech, (required in speeches two, three, and four) include them in the speech with a short spoken citation and provide a bibliography on the outline.

Speech 3 (due in week six)

This speech requires the use of research and outside sources in creating your speech; include them in a bibliography as well as citing them in the outline and subsequent speech.

Speech 3 is a 4 to 6 minute (closer to 6 minutes than to 4) speech in which you seek to persuade the audience to take some action or change some behavior or way of thinking. This argument is based on research, not on opinion, values, or beliefs. The essence of this speech is meant to cause the audience to respond in some way.

While you may attempt to elicit an emotional response from the audience, the bulk of your argument must be based on current factual research. Describe to the audience the significance of this research evidence and explain how an analysis of it leads to the proof of your thesis.
An example might be a speech arguing that the United States should (or should not) e

Identify and define a concept/idea from the chapter that connected or contrasted with what you experienced on your walk.

You must be walking alone. No combining your walk with someone else from the class. If someone approaches you, please tell them you are doing a class activity and will talk to them later.
No technology during your walk – shut off your phone, don’t check it, no music, etc.
Try to walk somewhere you’ve never been before or don’t go often.
Write your Application Reflection
IDENTIFY and DEFINE a concept/idea from the chapter that connected or contrasted with what you experienced on your walk.
Parenthetically cite the concept/idea you’re addressing. In other words, at the end of your description, put the page number of where that concept/idea is referenced in the text within parenthesis (172).
APPLY that concept to what you experienced on your walk. Describe what you experienced specifically.
EXTEND (optional) your concept/example to other concepts we’ve studied to date, appropriate outside source material, etc.
Please provide a link to that material within your application reflection.
Connected to additional interpersonal concepts other than those assigned for this app reflect.
Connected to credible outside source material, extra topic resources (from JSB on Moodle), etc.
Provided parenthetical citation for text material and links/bib citation for outside material.

How is your approach to the two different for you?

On Project 2, we worked more fully with analysis in writing. In Project 3 we continue that, and add formal research writing. What differences do you see between description/narrative/personal writing (Project 1) and the informal style of writing and formal research style (Project 3) writing? How is your approach to the two different for you/How has it been different? How are they/have they been the same or similar